Practice
A project file shows what was made. The practice that made it possible doesn't fit the case template. It lives in the standards held when the timeline got loud, the foundation built so the next project doesn't start from zero, the credit handed forward without a name attached. That work has no brief and no deliverable. It shapes what every project is allowed to become. The case studies are one record. This is the other.
What I protect
depth, when the brief asks for speed
What I build
the standard the next project starts from
What I give away
the credit, the spotlight, the next move
Cinnamon's lesson
Never let a wrong call go quiet.
Cinnamon Melchor was my first mentor at AKQA. She taught me a lot, but the lesson that stayed was this one. When something was wrong — a decision, a direction, a call about to ship — she raised it. Even when she was the most junior person in the room. Even when raising it was going to make the meeting longer, harder, more uncomfortable for everyone, including her.
She didn't soften it into a question. She didn't wrap it in three layers of validation to make it easier to receive. She named the wrong thing, in the room, while there was still time to fix it.
I watched it cost her, sometimes. The room would close around the easier answer. The senior person would get defensive. The meeting would get tense. And the work would still benefit, because someone in the room had refused to let the wrong call go quiet.
That's the principle I carry. The credit for catching it can go to whoever needs it most. The cost of raising it is mine to pay.
The retuning
Vita Haas named it. The slow drift where seniority blunts the signal the body used to send. You stop trusting the wince that told you something was off. You start trusting the room that signed off on it.
The drift isn't a failure. It's what the career path is built for. Each promotion moves you further from the tools, closer to the room where the tools are talked about. After enough years, the room becomes the work. The judgments still come, but they come from a distance the work doesn't quite reach.
I noticed it in myself. The eye had gotten faster than the hands. I could see what a screen should be. I'd watch someone else build something close to it. The gap between those two was getting easier to live with. That's the retuning. Comfort with the gap.
I didn't stop directing. I went back to the tools alongside it. Pick the file up. Sit with the decision at the level it actually happens. The spacing, the type call, the state nobody asks about until it's wrong. Most people at this level don't. Going back reads as regression by conventional signal.
Going back is the gesture. The discipline is what comes after.
The internal editor gets a time slot. Loud at the start. It should see everything, take notes, push the brief. Then it closes the door while you build. It comes back at the end. When the editor runs the whole session, you produce nothing. You revise air.
Maker mode takes runway. A morning is not four 90-minute blocks separated by syncs. You arrive at depth or you don't. We're all doing this to each other. The fix is structural, not personal.
What I got back was harder to name. A direct line to what good costs. The decisions that look obvious from the outside are the ones you've watched yourself avoid making. You don't have to imagine the resistance. You've felt it.
Hiring the standard
The standard I hire to is the standard I want them to leave being able to hold for themselves. If they can hold it without me in the room, the hiring worked. If they need me to hold it for them, I hired wrong. The interview is whether they can articulate the standard back at me in their own words. If they can, they'll hold it when no one's checking.
Three direct reports, three trajectories.
One started as a senior designer at Capital One, moved to a leadership role at Walmart, then to product design leadership at Instacart. Bigger company each move. Harder work each time. That progression isn't accidental. It's what someone holding their own standard looks like over time.
One moved from senior to principal inside a company Autodesk acquired. The promotion came from work I had no part in. That's the point.
One stayed at AKQA. We started as report and director. They are now a GCD. The relationship became peer.
Those three were before the current chapter. Now I run the largest pod of managers in my region, with six years in the hiring chair on the Delta account. The shape of the work has changed. The standard I hire to hasn't.
The cost of growing people at this scale is harder to talk about cleanly. What you protect for yourself is what you have to give them first. Their runway comes out of your day. Their depth comes from your attention. You get back what's left.
The credit for what they did is theirs. The cost of building them was the trade.
Earning the room
Advocacy and earning are different verbs. Advocacy says: we deserve to be here, trust us. Earning says: here's the business case, already built. One asks for the room. The other doesn't need to.
Business acumen for designers is almost entirely self-taught. It wasn't in design school. It isn't in most career paths. We come up through craft, execution, human-centered thinking, which is the right foundation and not the whole picture.
I learned to walk into a room with the competitive picture, the cost of waiting, and the business case already made. Not asking permission to have the conversation. The case is the conversation. Once the case is on the table, the design argument can be the design argument.
The risk in getting fluent in business language is becoming indistinguishable from everyone else in the room. That's not the goal. The goal is bilingual. Speaking business without stopping to argue in design.
Being trusted and being admired are different things. When they can't coexist, trust wins. The leaders I learned from weren't the ones most admired for their work. They were the ones their teams would work with again.
Depth compounds
Seventeen years at one agency. People read it as comfort. What actually compounded was less visible and harder to point at.
Standards I don't have to argue for anymore. They were argued for over years, with people I'm still working with, on problems I've watched change. The argument is settled. The standard runs.
Trust that didn't have to be built for this conversation. The hard one starts further along than it would somewhere else. We've had the prior version of it enough times to skip the parts that no longer need rehearsing.
Context I can use without explaining where it came from. Why the client tightens at that point in the call. What the third-tier exec is actually worried about. Where the system is brittle and where it's deeper than it looks. None of that lives in a deck. It lives in years.
The compounding shows up in what a project gets to start from. Foundation already poured. Trust already in the bank. The first day of the next engagement is further into the work than the first day at most places is allowed to be.
The case studies are the public record. This is what runs underneath them.
AKQA · 2008 → Present